Your Personal Bank Account is not Your Personal Bank Account

In North Carolina, the division of assets during a divorce is governed by the statute of equitable distribution (N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50-20). While the objective is a fair allocation of assets and debts, a pervasive misconception often obscures the process: the belief that legal ownership (whose name is on the deed, title, or account) dictates whether an asset is marital or separate. In reality, North Carolina law prioritizes the classification of property over its title, a distinction that frequently catches spouses off guard, particularly regarding personal bank accounts.

The cornerstone of equitable distribution is the definition of "marital property." Under North Carolina law, marital property includes almost all real and personal property acquired by either spouse during the course of the marriage and before the date of separation. The statute notably ignores whose name is attached to the asset. Unlike common law title states where ownership was once dispositive, North Carolina utilizes a "source of funds" rule. This means the court looks behind the title to determine how the asset was acquired. If a car, a home, or an investment was purchased with funds earned during the marriage, it is marital property, even if it is titled exclusively in the husband’s or wife’s name. Title is merely a formality; classification is the substantive legal reality.

This principle is most frequently overlooked in the context of personal bank accounts. It is common for spouses to maintain separate checking or savings accounts during a marriage, often under the assumption that "my account equals my money." However, from a legal standpoint, the name on the bank statement is largely irrelevant. If the funds in that personal account were derived from the spouse’s employment income, bonuses, or business earnings during the marriage, those funds are classified as marital property.

Because earnings during the marriage are the result of the marital economic partnership, they belong to the marital estate the moment they are earned. Depositing those earnings into a solely titled account does not transmute them into separate property. Consequently, a spouse who diligently saves their salary in a private account for a decade may be shocked to find that the entire balance is subject to division. These accounts are often "overlooked" assets because the other spouse may simply assume they have no claim to an account they cannot access. Without a thorough discovery process, substantial marital assets hidden in plain sight within "personal" accounts can be unfairly excluded from the distribution.

Ultimately, equitable distribution in North Carolina is an exercise in tracing value, not reading titles. By focusing on the source of the funds and the timing of the acquisition, the law ensures that marriage is treated as a true economic partnership. Parties must recognize that a separate bank account is not a shield against equitable distribution, and that the classification of property will always supersede the name printed on the ledger.

Next
Next

Understanding the Hearsay Problem